.png)
In most growing businesses, finances appear to be in place.
There is a bookkeeper.
Reporting is being produced.
Compliance is handled.
The numbers exist.
What changes over time is not the presence of finance, but how useful it is.
As the business grows, financial complexity increases. The volume of transactions rises, revenue becomes less linear, and more decisions depend on timing rather than totals.
At that point, finance does not break - it just becomes harder to use.
The effort required to understand the business’s financial position increases. Confidence in decision-making decreases. The team becomes more involved in financial coordination than they should be.
This is the stage where finance stops supporting the business and starts slowing it down.
The Messy Middle is a Structural Problem, Not a Reporting Problem
The messy middle is the stage where financial data exists, but is not structured in a way that supports how the business runs.
.png)
Most businesses in this stage have:
- access to financial data
- regular reporting
- bookkeeping and accounting support
What they lack is a clear, connected system that turns that information into usable insight and creates a cavernous gap that shows up in how the business operates.
Financial data is fragmented across systems.
Processes require manual input.
Reporting reflects what has happened, but does not provide a clear view of what is ahead.
As a result, the business operates with limited visibility, particularly in relation to cash flow.
Without a structured view of inflows, outflows, and timing, it becomes difficult to answer fundamental questions:
- What does our cash position look like over the next quarter?
- Can we support this level of growth?
- Where are we exposed if conditions change?
Without clear answers, decisions require interpretation and carry unnecessary risk.
How This Showed up at Ecotourism Australia
Ecotourism Australia operates as the national peak body for sustainable tourism, supporting hundreds of operators across the country.
Their model includes multiple products, varying membership tiers, and renewal cycles that do not align neatly across the year. The organisation also operates within a governance framework that requires reliable financial reporting, forecasting, and oversight.
As demand for sustainability increased, the organisation expanded.
We spoke with Nadine Schramm, Head of Sustainability Assurance and Operations, about what changed internally as that growth accelerated.
“Because sustainability is becoming more and more the norm, we’ve been very busy the last few years… our systems had to keep up with that change.”
As the organisation grew, the financial setup did not evolve at the same pace.
“It was very manual and reactive… everything was pretty much manual and disconnected.”
Financial data was spread across systems, with a reliance on spreadsheets and manual processes. Timing depended on a part-time accounts function, which introduced delays.
“There were delays… a lot of miscommunication and duplication… it was very admin heavy.”
At this stage, finance was not only inefficient. It limited the organisation’s ability to clearly understand its financial position.
Growth Exposes the Limits of Financial Visibility
As new products were introduced and the customer base expanded, the increase in activity added a level of complexity that the existing systems were not designed to support.
“Our customer base grew very, very quickly and our systems weren’t able to keep up.”
This had a direct impact on financial visibility, because without connected systems and consistent structure:
- cash flow sat across multiple sources
- forecasting required manual consolidation
- timing decisions were harder to make with confidence
“Our finance system wasn’t scalable… in order to continue that growth, we had to do a complete turnaround.”
The limitation was not the effort being applied, but of the structure supporting that effort. The organisation had bookkeeping, it had accounting, and iIt had systems. Tick.
What it did not have, however, was a defined way for those elements to operate together as a function.
“It wasn’t just an admin gap - it was a structural gap in our finance system and how we were set up.”
Financial information required interpretation.
Processes were not connected.
Responsibility sat across roles rather than within a clearly owned function.
The system depended on the team to bridge those gaps. As complexity increased, so did the effort required to maintain it.
What Changes When Finance is Structured Properly
The shift is not driven by more reporting or additional tools. It comes from structuring finance so that it operates as part of the business.
At Eco Tourism Australia, this involved introducing ownership across the financial function and aligning systems, processes, and reporting into a single operating structure.
“Jack really took ownership of the entire financial function for us… we now have a single contact point and someone who understands all of our products and systems.”
This created consistency in how finance runs day-to-day and removed the need for the team to coordinate across fragmented responsibilities. At the end of the day, clearer visibility entirely changes how the business makes decisions.
As financial operations became structured, the organisation gained a clearer and more reliable view of its financial position.
“What changed most is the clarity that we now have. We have structure, we have rhythm… everything became a lot more proactive instead of reactive.”
This clarity is most significant in relation to cash flow.
With consistent reporting and forward visibility:
- cash flow can be forecasted with confidence
- the timing of inflows and outflows is understood
- potential risks are identified earlier
- decisions can be made based on a reliable financial position
“We can make decisions confidently knowing that we can trust the numbers and the data.”
The numbers themselves did not change. The ability to use them did.
Reduced Friction Allows the Business to Operate Properly
One of the clearest indicators of change is the reduction in internal effort required to manage finance.
“I see a lot less of my team talking about accounts and issues… it’s not brought up too much with issues as it was before.”
Fewer delays, fewer workarounds, and less duplication reduce the need for ongoing involvement from the team.
“They can go back to the work they’re supposed to do rather than focusing on too much admin.”
Finance operates as a system, rather than a task.
Why This Matters For Growing Businesses
The situation at Eco Tourism Australia reflects a broader pattern.
Many businesses reach a stage where:
- financial data exists
- reporting is in place
- but visibility and structure are limited
At that point, the constraint is not effort. It is the way finance is organised.
Without a structured financial function:
- cash flow visibility remains incomplete
- decision-making becomes slower and more cautious
- teams take on financial coordination alongside their core roles
- growth introduces pressure instead of leverage
Addressing this requires aligning financial operations with how the business actually runs.
Kirbyko exists to support the exact moment where businesses outgrow basic bookkeeping and ad-hoc processes. We partner with founders, owners, and CEO's who want clarity, structure, and consistency - not more spreadsheets or more people to manage. Our team becomes your entire outsourced finance function, managing everything from workflows and approvals to reporting, systems, and financial coordination.
If you’re ready to move away from reactive problem-solving and towards stable, scalable financial operations, we can help you build the structure your business needs to grow confidently.
